Johan Smith
Forecasting income is hard enough in commercial businesses. But in the non-profit sector, it's a whole different ballgame. Not because non-profits don't plan carefully (they do) but because the very nature of their income is far more uncertain, especially when you look at the mix of public funding and fundraising income, and the complexities of restricted income.
Both streams play a critical role in sustaining operations and delivering impact, but they come with very different levels of predictability, constraints, and planning dynamics. So let's take a closer look at why forecasting income is so difficult in non-profits, and what can be done to improve it.
Public sector grants and subsidies (whether from national governments, regional authorities, or EU programmes) often form a major part of non-profit income. In many ways, these are more predictable than fundraising: they tend to follow annual cycles, come with formal contracts, and are confirmed in advance.
But "predictable" doesn't mean "simple." Public funding is often:
This makes forecasting tricky. Even if a grant is approved, questions remain: When will the money come in? Can we carry over unused amounts? What if activities get delayed? These variables can significantly impact cash flow forecasts and require close coordination with programme teams.
Unlike public funding, fundraising income (from individuals, donors, events, and campaigns) is often unrestricted. That's a huge advantage, because it offers flexibility in how funds are used. But it's also much harder to predict.
Why? Because fundraising is affected by:
Fundraising teams often build forecasts based on previous years' results, adjusted for new campaigns or donor expectations. But it's still part science, part art, and prone to overestimation or sudden drops. A missed event, cancelled campaign, or PR issue can wipe out expected revenue in an instant.
Here's where it gets even harder: you still need to build a budget. That means putting numbers to income that may or may not materialise, at a time when you're trying to plan staffing, programming, and operations.
Some non-profits take a conservative approach, only budgeting what's confirmed. Others take a more optimistic route, assuming most of the income will come through. Neither approach is wrong, but both come with trade-offs. Conservative budgets may limit impact; optimistic budgets may require cuts later.
Restricted funding in the non-profit sector refers to donations or grants that must be used for a specific purpose defined by the donor. While this type of funding can be essential for targeted programs, it adds complexity to the budgeting and accounting process. Non-profits must carefully track how these funds are spent, ensure compliance with donor restrictions, and report separately on restricted versus unrestricted income. This often requires detailed allocation of costs, separate fund accounting, and more granular reporting, increasing administrative workload and the risk of errors if not managed properly.
There's no magic formula to make income 100% predictable, but there are smart ways to improve forecasting:
Tools like XLReporting make this easier by letting you build structured, activity-based forecasts that can flex with your assumptions. Instead of rigid spreadsheets, you get a living model that helps you plan with clarity, even when income is unpredictable.
Non-profits don't have the luxury of guaranteed revenue or endless reserves. Every euro must count, and every euro must be accounted for in terms of how it is spent. That's why accurate forecasting is so essential, not just for financial planning, but for ensuring impact, accountability, and long-term sustainability.
Forecasting income may never be easy. But with the right tools and mindset, it can become less of a guessing game, and more of a strategic advantage.
Do you want to explore how XLReporting can help you? Request a demo today! Click here
Back to the listSchedule a Meeting with one of our Planning and Reporting Experts.
Let's Talk